Hi Frieder, On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:18 AM Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schre...@kontron.de> wrote:
> > If you prepare a patch I would prefer to have separate names for the SPL > > image and the final concatenated image. So we don't overwrite the SPL image > > and can still use it on its own if needed. > > But rather than choosing a new name for the complete image (as Heiko did > > above), I would like to rename the SPL image to something more meaningful > > like spl.bin first and then use flash.bin for the full image. > > What do you think? It seems we cannot rename the SPL to spl.bin as this would cause breakage to i.MX8MM boards that do not use binman, such as verdin-imx8mm_defconfig. > And it would also be nice if we could share the common parts of the binman > config between the different boards to avoid having this in each boards dtsi > and to avoid having diverging configurations, where e. g. flash.bin refers to > different kinds of images. Agreed. Let me try to send a proposal for imx8mm-evk first. If it gets accepted, then I can try to make a common approach. Regards, Fabio Estevam
