Hi Simon,
sorry for late response i was offline a bit
W dniu 13.07.2021 o 22:17, Simon Glass pisze:
> Hi Paweł,
>
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 12:59, Paweł Jarosz <paweljarosz3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add clock driver for rk3066 platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paweł Jarosz <paweljarosz3...@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@vrull.eu>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - updated to shifted masks
>> - moved clk init to tpl
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - none
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> - none
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>> - updated to current codebase
>> - fixed compilation errors
>>
>> Changes since v5:
>> - various style changes
>> - added clk_enable/clk_disable support for nand and mmc clocks
>> - updated maintainer email
>> - renamed uint32_t to u32
>> - used #if IS_ENABLED macro instead #ifdef
>>
>>
>>
>> .../include/asm/arch-rockchip/cru_rk3066.h | 203 +++++
>> drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rk3066.c | 704 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 908 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-rockchip/cru_rk3066.h
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rk3066.c
>>
> [..]
>
>> +
>> +static int rk3066_clk_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev)
>> +{
>> +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA)
>> + struct rk3066_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
>> +
>> + priv->cru = dev_read_addr_ptr(dev);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rk3066_clk_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct rk3066_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
>> +
>> + priv->grf = syscon_get_first_range(ROCKCHIP_SYSCON_GRF);
>> + if (IS_ERR(priv->grf))
>> + return PTR_ERR(priv->grf);
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD)
> Do you need that? The line below should take care of it.
Yep. Later rkclk_init and rkclk_configure_cpu should be only executed in TPL.
>> +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA)
>> + struct rk3066_clk_plat *plat = dev_get_plat(dev);
>> +
>> + priv->cru = map_sysmem(plat->dtd.reg[0], plat->dtd.reg[1]);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + rkclk_init(priv->cru, priv->grf);
>> +
>> + /* Init CPU frequency */
>> + rkclk_configure_cpu(priv->cru, priv->grf, APLL_SAFE_HZ);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rk3066_clk_bind(struct udevice *dev)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct udevice *sys_child;
>> + struct sysreset_reg *priv;
>> +
>> + /* The reset driver does not have a device node, so bind it here */
>> + ret = device_bind_driver(dev, "rockchip_sysreset", "sysreset",
>> + &sys_child);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + debug("Warning: No sysreset driver: ret=%d\n", ret);
>> + } else {
>> + priv = malloc(sizeof(struct sysreset_reg));
>> + priv->glb_srst_fst_value = offsetof(struct rk3066_cru,
>> + cru_glb_srst_fst_value);
>> + priv->glb_srst_snd_value = offsetof(struct rk3066_cru,
>> + cru_glb_srst_snd_value);
>> + dev_set_priv(sys_child, priv);
>> + }
>> +
>> +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(RESET_ROCKCHIP)
> Can you use if() instead of #if ?
Yes, but what is the difference? Sorry ... I don't know what to ask google to
get the answer.
Is it in this case doing the same thing and just looking better?
Regards,
Paweł Jarosz
>> + ret = offsetof(struct rk3066_cru, cru_softrst_con[0]);
>> + ret = rockchip_reset_bind(dev, ret, 9);
>> + if (ret)
>> + debug("Warning: software reset driver bind failed\n");
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct udevice_id rk3066_clk_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066a-cru" },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +
>> +U_BOOT_DRIVER(rockchip_rk3066a_cru) = {
>> + .name = "rockchip_rk3066a_cru",
>> + .id = UCLASS_CLK,
>> + .of_match = rk3066_clk_ids,
>> + .priv_auto = sizeof(struct rk3066_clk_priv),
>> + .plat_auto = sizeof(struct rk3066_clk_plat),
>> + .ops = &rk3066_clk_ops,
>> + .bind = rk3066_clk_bind,
>> + .of_to_plat = rk3066_clk_of_to_plat,
>> + .probe = rk3066_clk_probe,
>> +};
>> --
>> 2.32.0
>>
> Regards,
> Simon
