On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Sughosh Ganu <sugho...@juniper.net> wrote: > On Wed Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58:30AM +0300, Darius Augulis wrote: > >> No, there could be several different relocation methods - with and >> without preloader etc. >> There is another definition CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT which changes >> boot sequence dramatically. >> And it isn't CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC dependent. > > I don't think we can define CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT with > relocation enabled unless we ensure that the TEXT_BASE would be same > as the relocation address.
in case of nand_spl you don't need to to relocation twice because it's done by preloader. > > -sughosh > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
