Let's look at this example. Here is what I see on
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-October/thread.html.
[U-Boot] U-boot versions - reply to RM + SW David Collier
[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: support new relocation
scheme Shawn Guo
[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx51evk: support new relocation
scheme Shawn Guo
[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM
base address Shawn Guo
[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM
base address Jason Liu
[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM
base address Shawn Guo
[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: consolidate env for mmcboot
and netboot Shawn Guo
But I really expect something like below (added In-Reply-To ID).
[U-Boot] U-boot versions - reply to RM + SW David Collier
[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: support new relocation scheme Shawn Guo
[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx51evk: support new relocation
scheme Shawn Guo
<1288019681-18496-1-git-send-email-shawn....@gmail.com>
[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM
base address Shawn Guo
<1288019681-18496-1-git-send-email-shawn....@gmail.com>
[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct
internal RAM base address Jason Liu
[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM
base address Shawn Guo
<1288019681-18496-1-git-send-email-shawn....@gmail.com>
[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: consolidate env for mmcboot and netboot Shawn Guo
Is this some problem with u-boot mail list threading itself or the gmail mailer?
--
Regards,
Shawn
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
