Hi Patrick,

On 5/28/21 4:59 AM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
Hi,

Any reason to preferĀ  uint16_t and uint32_t ?

I use standard C types. u32, _u32, and __u32 are non-standard, and they have different meanings depending on how they're used. I avoid them for this reason.

Alex

See checkpatch warning

arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/tzc.h:24: check: Prefer kernel type 'u16' over 'uint16_t' arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/tzc.h:25: check: Prefer kernel type 'u16' over 'uint16_t' arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/tzc400.c:41: check: Prefer kernel type 'u16' over 'uint16_t' arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/tzc400.c:52: check: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t' arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/tzc400.c:81: check: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t' arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/tzc400.c:82: check: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t' arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/tzc400.c:93: check: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t' arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/tzc400.c:94: check: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t' arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/tzc400.c:113: check: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t'

But except these remarks:

Reviewed-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@foss.st.com>

Thanks
Patrick

Reply via email to