On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:56:29PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 6:25 AM Marek Behún <marek.be...@nic.cz> wrote:
> >
> > Enable LTO for some boards that were tested by people on U-Boot Mailing
> > List.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <marek.be...@nic.cz>
> > Tested-by: Adam Ford <aford...@gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Pali Rohár <p...@kernel.org>
> > Tested-by: Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com>
> 
> Since the imx8mm beacon boards and the imx8mm venice board both show
> promise, does it make sense to 'imply' the LTO for anything enabling
> imx8mm?
> Same thing for the various omap3 boards, and potentially the renesas
> RZ/G2 boards.  I know Tom went through to remove a bunch of boards
> that were never converted to DM.  Most of the boards remaining boards
> have minimal board files and most of code is common to other boards in
> the same platforms.
> 
> I have an l138_lcdk that I can use to test which I expect to be
> similar to the da850evm.

As much as I am eager to move everything, quickly, over to LTO by
default, I think the problems that we've seen thus far show it's best to
really make it an explicit enable per board at least for the first
release or two.  Once we've hopefully gotten more boards tested and
enabled we can see what makes sense for defaults, give a release worth
of heads up, and then go.

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to