On 3/30/21 2:17PM, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have any updates from Tim that you don't. I assume he's still > silently hacking at it.
Yep, I'm working on a software implementation of ECDSA. Currently have the OpenSSL implementation for the nistp256 curve isolated, debugging a test program that verifies a signature on data that was randomly generated, then will need to clean up unnecessary code and fit it into U-Boot. CC'd my @linux.microsoft.com email, I prefer to use that one from now on. All the best, Tim -----Original Message----- From: Alex G. <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> Sent: March 29, 2021 2:43 PM To: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>; Tim Romanski <t-troman...@microsoft.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] test: dm: Add test for ECDSA UCLASS support + Tim On 3/29/21 2:43 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Alexandru, > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 13:24, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This test verifies that ECDSA_UCLASS is implemented, and that >> ecdsa_verify() works as expected. The definition of "expected" is >> "does not find a device, and returns -ENODEV". >> >> The lack of a hardware-independent ECDSA implementation prevents us >> from having one in the sandbox, for now. > > Yes we do need a software impl at some point. Any update on that? I don't have any updates from Tim that you don't. I assume he's still silently hacking at it. Alex