On 3/30/21 2:17PM, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have any updates from Tim that you don't. I assume he's still 
> silently hacking at it.

Yep, I'm working on a software implementation of ECDSA. Currently have the 
OpenSSL implementation for the nistp256 curve isolated, debugging a test 
program that verifies a signature on data that was randomly generated, then 
will need to clean up unnecessary code and fit it into U-Boot.

CC'd my @linux.microsoft.com email, I prefer to use that one from now on.

All the best,
Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex G. <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> 
Sent: March 29, 2021 2:43 PM
To: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>; 
Tim Romanski <t-troman...@microsoft.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] test: dm: Add test for ECDSA UCLASS 
support

+ Tim

On 3/29/21 2:43 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Alexandru,
> 
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 13:24, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This test verifies that ECDSA_UCLASS is implemented, and that
>> ecdsa_verify() works as expected. The definition of "expected" is 
>> "does not find a device, and returns -ENODEV".
>>
>> The lack of a hardware-independent ECDSA implementation prevents us 
>> from having one in the sandbox, for now.
> 
> Yes we do need a software impl at some point. Any update on that?

I don't have any updates from Tim that you don't. I assume he's still silently 
hacking at it.

Alex

Reply via email to