> > Albert ARIBAUD <albert.arib...@free.fr> wrote on 2010/10/13 11:05:09: > > > > Le 13/10/2010 09:07, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit : > > > > > Did you use -msingle-pic-base too with -fpic/-fPIC? This is what makes > > > a difference(together with -fpic). The most interesting size is > > > the total flash size IMHO. Reducing insn's in RAM at the expense > > > of flash is not what most users need I think. > > > > Yes, I did use -msingle-pic-base -- actually, I am the one who submitted > > > the patch for ARM to that effect, precisely after all my tests :) -- but > > > the code growth I am talking about is accesses, not setup. > > Ah, that was you. That patch made me look at adding -msingle-pic-base to
> ppc :) Does -msingle-pic-base work on ARM for both -fpic and -fPIC? I have a hard time making -fPIC work, I think it isn't possible with the current impl. of -fPIC on ppc. Jocke _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
