On 2/19/21 5:52 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 04:58, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote:
test/cmd/setexpr.c cannot be linked with CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR=n:
ld.bfd: test/built-in.o: in function `setexpr_test_sub':
test/cmd/setexpr.c:227: undefined reference to `setexpr_regex_sub'
ld.bfd: test/built-in.o: in function `setexpr_test_backref':
test/cmd/setexpr.c:267: undefined reference to `setexpr_regex_sub'
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
---
test/cmd/Makefile | 2 +-
test/cmd_ut.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
But I wonder what the goal is here. There is an assumption at present
that sandbox runs these tests and has the required features enabled.
What are you trying to do?
CONFIG_UNIT_TEST does not depend on the architecture.
I enable and run unit tests on my real hardware, e.g. under RISC-V.
Tests that cannot be built or run with the current configuration should
not lead to build failures.
Best regards
Heinrich
