On 11.01.21 11:27, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
> Since commit 0f036bf4b87e ("env: Warn on force access if 
> ENV_ACCESS_IGNORE_FORCE set")
> a warning message is displayed when setenv -f is used WITHOUT
> CONFIG_ENV_ACCESS_IGNORE_FORCE, but the variable is set anyway, resulting
> in lots of log pollution.
>
> env_flags_validate() returns 0 if the access is accepted, or non zero
> if it is refused.
>
> So the original code
>       #ifndef CONFIG_ENV_ACCESS_IGNORE_FORCE
>               if (flag & H_FORCE)
>                       return 0;
>       #endif
>
> was correct, it returns 0 (accepts the modification) if forced UNLESS
> IGNORE_FORCE is set (in which case access checks in the following code
> are applied). The broken patch just added a printf to the force accepted
> case.
>
> To obtain the intent of the patch we need this:
>       if (flag & H_FORCE) {
>       #ifdef CONFIG_ENV_ACCESS_IGNORE_FORCE
>               printf("## Error: Can't force access to \"%s\"\n", name);
>       #else
>               return 0;
>       #endif
>       }
>
> Fixes: 0f036bf4b87e ("env: Warn on force access if ENV_ACCESS_IGNORE_FORCE 
> set")
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group>
> ---
>  env/flags.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/env/flags.c b/env/flags.c
> index df4aed2..e3e833c 100644
> --- a/env/flags.c
> +++ b/env/flags.c
> @@ -563,12 +563,13 @@ int env_flags_validate(const struct env_entry *item, 
> const char *newval,

Please, add a Sphinx style function description in include/env_flags.h
explaining exactly what this function is meant to do.

Cf.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#function-documentation

>               return 1;
>  #endif
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_ENV_ACCESS_IGNORE_FORCE
>       if (flag & H_FORCE) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_ACCESS_IGNORE_FORCE
>               printf("## Error: Can't force access to \"%s\"\n", name);

If this is an error, why don't you return 1 (failure)?
Please, use log_err() for error messages.

> +#else
>               return 0;

Why shouldn't the other tests be executed?

Best regards

Heinrich

> -     }
>  #endif
> +     }
>       switch (op) {
>       case env_op_delete:
>               if (item->flags & ENV_FLAGS_VARACCESS_PREVENT_DELETE) {
>

Reply via email to