[PATCH 1/1] dma: bcm6348: incorrect buffer allocation

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

Calling calloc() for 0 members does not make any sense.
Setting ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL for ch_priv->desc_cnt > 0 is equally
unreasonable.

The current code will lead to a NULL dereference in bcm6348_iudma_enable().

The assignments for ch_priv->busy_desc are obviously swapped.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
---
I have no device to actually test the driver.
---
 drivers/dma/bcm6348-iudma.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm6348-iudma.c b/drivers/dma/bcm6348-iudma.c
index 91172d483c..81597c56a7 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/bcm6348-iudma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/bcm6348-iudma.c
@@ -313,10 +313,10 @@ static int bcm6348_iudma_request(struct dma *dma)
        ch_priv->desc_id = 0;
        if (bcm6348_iudma_chan_is_rx(dma->id)) {
                ch_priv->desc_cnt = 0;
-               ch_priv->busy_desc = calloc(ch_priv->desc_cnt, sizeof(bool));
+               ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL;
        } else {
                ch_priv->desc_cnt = ch_priv->dma_ring_size;
-               ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL;
+               ch_priv->busy_desc = calloc(ch_priv->desc_cnt, sizeof(bool));
        }

        return 0;
--
2.29.2