Dne Út 5. října 2010 04:05:57 Kyungmin Park napsal(a): > Hi, > > I tested it with the latest u-boot codes. and without OneNAND patch, > it's boot and working well. > > Of course I used the relocation method at u-boot.
Well is it necessary to expose this stuff so much anyway ? Why can't it be in that function? Besides, in my case, the .data doesn't exist at the place where it was before relocation after the relocation is done. With this patch though, I have no problems even in that case. Cheers > > Thank you, > Kyungmin Park > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dne Po 4. října 2010 23:18:51 Scott Wood napsal(a): > >> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:15:11 +0200 > >> > >> Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Dne Po 4. října 2010 19:59:14 Scott Wood napsal(a): > >> > > NACK, you're taking the address of stack data and using it after the > >> > > stack frame goes away. > >> > > >> > The .data section doesn't exist at 0x0 (where the stuff is linked) > >> > when this code is executed in my case. > >> > >> So fix the linking. :-) > > > > I'd gladly accept any suggestion or if you could point me in a correct > > direction. > > > >> -Scott > > > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot mailing list > > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
