Dear Wolfgang Denk, >>> Patch 1 will change the #if and introduce CONFIG_AT91SAM9_FAMILY >>> instead. >>> >>> Patch 2 will fix at91/clock.c+timer.c >> Maybe there is a misunderstanding here. I see three patches >> >> 1. introduce CONFIG_AT91SAM9_FAMILY to common.h >> >> 2. add an #ifdef CONFIG_AT91SAM9_FAMILY to global_data.h with the >> required variables >> >> 3. change clock and timer. >> >> 2+3 combined in one patch? OK > > No. 1 + 2 belong together; they deal with the same topic and should > be applied as a single commit.
Ok, so introducing (at this point still) unreferenced variables here is OK? > 3 is a completely different story and goes in a separate patch. > >> And I bet, this must be a patch series ;) > > Not necessarily. The 1+2 combo is independent from 3 (but needed as a > prerequisite, so posting this in a series is fine as well). Ok, I rather post it independant, if thats OK, patch series are still more trouble ;) Best Regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
