Le 04/10/2010 09:27, Reinhard Meyer a écrit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>>
>> Right now I can build (not run, mind you) u-boot for edminiv2 without
>> -fPIC/-fPIE, with -pie and a modified u-boot.lds and start.S. Almost all
>> of the .rel.dyn fixup entries are type 23, that is, relative to the base
>> address, which is good. However, here are about ten at the end which are
>> type 2 -- symbol-relative -- and I am studying them in order to see if
>> they are needed.
>>
>> If type 23 relocations are all that is needed, then a first ARM ELF
>> relocation implementation should 'simply' trade GOT vs .rel.dyn
>> relocation in start.S (I am almost there) and remove fixups in
>> board_init_r. Start.S would apply type 23 fixups only and ignore the
>> rest. Later on we could add a build stage to rewrite the .rel.dyn
>> section as suggested, by filtering out non-type-23 relocs and keeping
>> only the address part of type-23 ones, reducing the .rel.dyn table
>> roughly by half.
>>
>> The good news is, I can spare a couple more hours today on this. I'll
>> let you all know how this fares!
>
> Thats good news! How much did the image size increase with this table?
./MAKEALL edminiv2 results:
text data bss dec hex filename
141376 4388 16640 162404 27a64 ./u-boot (for GOT reloc)
150160 3819 16640 170619 29a7b ./u-boot (for ELF reloc)
u-boot.bin size in bytes:
145764 (for GOT reloc)
153976 (for ELF reloc)
The .rel.dyn table is 18472 bytes, and should eventually shrink by half,
losing about 9 KB. That would bring the u-boot.bin size down to
145 KB, roughly the same size as GOT reloc -- plus we'd save a few code
bytes since reloc fixup functions in board_init_r would not be needed
any more.
> And I am willing to test your efforts on AT91 here, maybe you can send me
> the changes to .lds and start.S beforehand so I can see what type of
> relocation info gets produced here.
I'll post an RFC patch within one or two hours.
> A rather wild, but quite arch independant additional "build stage" for
> relocation would be to link u-boot for two different TEXT_BASE values
> e.g. TEXT_BASE (as desired) and TEXT_BASE+0x00010010. A special "diff"
> tool should find the 32 bit places where relocation is required and
> add a table to the end of u-boot.bin... (Just a rough idea)
That would be the simplest option even though it's obviously not
optimal. Feel free to start this if you want, and let's meet at the
bridge. :)
> Best Regards,
> Reinhard
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
