Hi Cyril,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:45 PM <cyril.j...@microchip.com> wrote:
> On 11/27/20 1:43 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know
> the content is safe
> >
> > Hi Padmarao,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 8:18 PM Padmarao Begari
> > <padmarao.beg...@microchip.com> wrote:
> >> Add device tree for Microchip PolarFire SoC Icicle Kit.
> snip
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/dts/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> >> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Microchip Technology Inc */
> >> +
> >> +/dts-v1/;
> >> +#include "dt-bindings/clock/microchip,pfsoc-clock.h"
> >> +
> >> +/* Clock frequency (in Hz) of the rtcclk */
> >> +#define RTCCLK_FREQ 1000000
> >> +
> >> +/ {
> >> + #address-cells = <2>;
> >> + #size-cells = <2>;
> >> + model = "Microchip PolarFire-SoC";
> >> + compatible = "microchip,polarfire-soc";
> > Should this be: "microchip,polarfire-soc-icicle-kit"?
>
> My preference for this would go to: "microchip,mpfs-icicle-kit". This is
> the name used to order the board and what is written on the box.
>
>
ok
> As a rule please use "mpfs" as identifier in place of "polarfire-soc",
> "pfsoc", "pse", "g5soc" or whatever other variation on the theme when
> not using the marketing name of the device.
>
>
ok
Regards
Padmarao
> Regards,
>
> Cyril.
>
>
>
