On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 08:10 +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Peter, > > Peter Tyser wrote: > > Add the ability to not report an I2C POST error for a set of given I2C > > addresses on bootup. This is useful for the following cases: > > > > - Some form factors such as XMC and Compact PCI Express have an I2C > > EEPROM whose address changes based on geographical address. Eg > > installed in one slot its EEPROM address is, 0x50, in another its > > 0x51, etc. This allows multiple devices to have their EEPROMs present > > on the same I2C bus. Thus the I2C devices present for an XMC or > > CPCIe card depend on if and where other cards are installed in the > > same system. > > > > - Some cards have optional I2C devices. Eg one hardware build > > configuration has different I2C devices than another. > > > > - Some cards have optional daughtercards with I2C devices on them. > > > > - I2C EEPROMs address range depends on their size. Its possible to > > support differently size EEPROMs by only probing the EEPROM's base > > address and ignoring the other addresses that are impacted by its > > size. > > > > A new I2C_ADDR_IGNORE_LIST define has been added which specifies a list > > of I2C addresses for the I2C POST to ignore. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <pty...@xes-inc.com> > > CC: h...@denx.de > > --- > > post/drivers/i2c.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Maybe you can add a little info in the README?
The existing I2C_ADDR_LIST isn't documented, so I didn't document this addition. I'll mention them both in doc/README.POST. > > diff --git a/post/drivers/i2c.c b/post/drivers/i2c.c > > index 2dd128e..9e1fd50 100644 > > --- a/post/drivers/i2c.c > > +++ b/post/drivers/i2c.c > > @@ -40,6 +40,20 @@ > > > > #if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_I2C > > > > +static int i2c_ignore_device(unsigned int chip) > > +{ > > +#ifdef I2C_ADDR_IGNORE_LIST > > Hmm.. as this is only used in post code, this should be visible > in the defines name, what with: > > I2C_POST_ADDR_IGNORE_LIST I was following the lead of the existing I2C_ADDR_LIST define. Agreed it should be named differently. I'll go with CONFIG_SYS_POST_I2C_ADDRS and CONFIG_SYS_POST_I2C_IGNORES unless someone else chimes in. Thanks for the review, Peter _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot