On 06.10.20 14:43, Grant Likely wrote: > > Current U-Boot by default uses the same DT image for both U-Boot > internal setup and to provide to the OS. This should be split so that > the U-Boot internal version has what U-Boot needs without needs to track > mainline Linux DTB schema. > > I've been looking into a generic config for adding a separate OS-dtb to > U-Boot that is not used internally and is only passed to the OS. That > would solve the problem you're seeing above.
What would be the advantage of building said second device-tree into U-Boot instead of loading it from a (possibly signed) file? Best regards Heinrich > > That doesn't solve the problem of DTB schema stability, but it at least > decouples the problem so we're not stuck. > > g.
