Hi Samuel, On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 16:57, Samuel Holland <sam...@sholland.org> wrote: > > On 9/1/20 6:13 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Add an entry for ARM Trusted Firmware's 'BL31' payload, which is the > > device's main firmware. Typically this is U-Boot. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > Changes in v3: > > - Rebase on top of earlier binman series > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Add the URL of ARM Trusted Firmware and mention of U-Boot docs > > - Fix copyright year > > - Update docs to indicate that BL31 is loaded from SPL > > - Update docs to mention both bl31.bin and bl31.elf > > > > tools/binman/README.entries | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > tools/binman/etype/atf_bl31.py | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tools/binman/ftest.py | 9 +++++++++ > > tools/binman/test/169_atf_bl31.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 tools/binman/etype/atf_bl31.py > > create mode 100644 tools/binman/test/169_atf_bl31.dts > > Does this mean every kind of firmware blob referenced by FIT generator scripts > (TEE fimware, SCP firmware, OpenSBI firmware, etc.) needs its own Python > package?
No, but in general I would like to do that if possible. It is easier that having random filenames in the description. > > What if you need multiple versions of ATF BL31 and TEE firmware for different > configurations, like Rockchip currently does? You can always specify a filename in the node. > You would need dynamic argument > names, but then how do you get them in the Makefile? Using the -a flag. > > This approach doesn't seem very flexible or scalable. > > Why not have a generic Entry_blob_named_by_env, with a "filename-var" (or > similar) property in addition to "filename"? Then the existing interface of > the > FIT generator scripts could be maintained without tons of boilerplate. You can do that if you like (see blob-named-by-arg and -a), but the idea with binman is that it knows how to deal with various types of binaries, and each one has a name. This makes it easier to see what is going on, I think. Also we get documentation about each binary type in README.entries Regards, Simon