Hi Marek

On 7/31/20 1:35 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The new 587-200 DHCOR SoM is compatible with the 587-100 prototype,
> hence just replicate the entries, as there is no pattern matching.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@st.com>
> Cc: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@st.com>
> ---
>  board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcom.its | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcom.its 
> b/board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcom.its
> index d8a1a28a11..905be57dff 100644
> --- a/board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcom.its
> +++ b/board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1/u-boot-dhcom.its
> @@ -44,12 +44,26 @@
>               };
>  
>               config-2 {
> +                     /* DT+SoM+board model */
> +                     description = 
> "dh,stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2_somrev1_boardrev0";
> +                     loadables = "uboot";
> +                     fdt = "fdt-1";
> +             };
> +
> +             config-3 {
>                       /* DT+SoM+board model */
>                       description = 
> "dh,stm32mp15xx-dhcom-drc02_somrev0_boardrev0";
>                       loadables = "uboot";
>                       fdt = "fdt-2";
>               };
>  
> +             config-4 {
> +                     /* DT+SoM+board model */
> +                     description = 
> "dh,stm32mp15xx-dhcom-drc02_somrev1_boardrev0";
> +                     loadables = "uboot";
> +                     fdt = "fdt-2";
> +             };
> +
>               /* Add 587-100..587-400 with fdt-2..fdt-4 here */
>       };
>  };

Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@st.com>

Thanks

Patrice

Reply via email to