On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 03:07:13AM +0000, ChiaWei Wang wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thank you for the feedback. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 11:26 PM > > To: ChiaWei Wang <chiawei_w...@aspeedtech.com> > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] requesting a custodian tree for Aspeed SoCs > > maintenance > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 03:19:43AM +0000, ChiaWei Wang wrote: > > o > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are Aspeed SW team and would like to request the creation of a > > > u-boot-aspeed.git custodian tree for the u-boot support related to > > > Aspeed SoCs. Attached is the SSH key generated for this purpose. > > > > > > By the way, the Aspeed SoCs are based on ARM architecture. However, we > > > are not sure if the Aspeed custodian tree should be a downstream of > > > u-boot-arm.git tree or not. As there is no update to u-boot-arm since 4 > > > years > > ago. > > > > > > If anything is further needed, please let us know. > > > > To start with, I would like to handle Aspeed development by pulling > > respective > > patches in to one of my testing branches and merge them after appropriate > > review time. If the volume of changes makes it worthwhile we can add a > > new custodian tree later. Thanks! > > So currently, should we simply submit individual Aspeed patches to the > mailing list for the review process? > In fact, we have sent certain patches couple days ago. > (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20200803093610.3222-1-chiawei_w...@aspeedtech.com/) > If it is the case, we will proceed the patch submission for Aspeed SoCs after > the review is done.
Correct, thanks. I'll likely be picking up those patches soon. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
