On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:17:47 +0200 Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear "V, Aneesh", > > In message <ff55437e1f14da4baeb721a458b6701706c5888...@dbde02.ent.ti.com> you > wrote: > > > > Presently, we are maintaining a mini bootloader(called x-loader, based > > on u-boot)separately. We want to integrate x-loader with u-boot and > > up-stream the source code. > > That would be greatly appreciated. > > > This looks promising. However, our SPL has to load u-boot from MMC. Is > > it OK to keep it under nand_spl directory or should we create > > something like 'mmc_spl'? > > Fr now we can stick with the nand_spl name (even if it's becoming a > bit misleading); I'd rather just change the name now -- misleading is bad whether there's one exception or several. > if other use cases get added we can discuss to rename it. Someone just internally posted a patch adding "i2c_spl", FWIW. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
