Le 15/09/2010 08:59, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4c905f6d.7010...@free.fr> you wrote: >> >> Both encodings are present in u-boot. I figure UTF-8 seems a better >> choice, but if there is a coding rule about encodings, I'll happily >> follow it, of course. > > So far we've been using ISO8859-1
It is not clear to me whether you're expressing a coding rule or just a statement of fact, so I'll ask more precise questions: 1) is UTF-8 allowed or not in u-boot? 2) if UTF-8 is allowed along with ISO8859-1, then a) which one should be preferred for new files, and b) which should be preferred for patches to existing files? 3) if UTF-8 is not allowed, then what should be done about the 56 u-boot source files that currently are UTF-8? Wolfgang, can you explicitly answer these points? In case the answer to question 3 is "they should be converted to ISO", of course being the one to raise the issue, I shall be the one to submit the fix. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
