Hi Mike, Thanks for following-up.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > it depends on the URLs. i dont think referring to the mainline git tree is > useful at all considering that's what they're using if they have this patch in Yes, I see your point: the mainline tree's URL is superfluous. > their tree. as for the omap1 reference, i'm not sure mentioning at all is > useful in the commit. presumably the tree in question will drop its code and > move to the mainline stuff one yours is merged. imo, that would make it a > "note" which goes below the "---". Ok -- I hadn't fully considered the ramifications of the fact that the commit message would be around long after the state of the omap-l1 tree had changed. I agree that this URL would be a note below the '---', if included at all. > if the URL is generally useful, then some people use a dedicated tag in the > "s-o-b" section such as "URL: xxx". this isnt exactly standardized. Neat. I'll keep that one in mind too, but not for external commits -- you have convinced me that it is not useful to include these in he commit message. Best Regards, Ben Gardiner --- Nanometrics Inc. http://www.nanometrics.ca _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
