On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:52:00 +0200 Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> wrote:
> Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote on 2010/09/13 21:21:33: > > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:19:34 +0200 > > Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear "Ira W. Snyder", > > > > > > > > In message <20100910181022.ga18...@ovro.caltech.edu> you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Would you prefer a patch only for the MPC8349EMDS, or should I try and > > > > > convert the other boards too? How should I know which boards are safe? > > > > > Grep for CONFIG_E300? > > > > > > > > I think we should try and update all boards where this applies. I'm > > > > not sure, but my wild guess is that this means all processors except > > > > 40x and 8xx (probably 5xx as well, but AFAICT there is no Linux > > > > available for these anyway, so it does not matter). > > > > > > I think 8xx can be fixed quite easily to do 16 MB if needed. Probably > > > won't be needed though. > > > > Actually, I got a complaint a while ago (I think it was Ben H) about > > problems with large kernels with debugging options on 8xx. > > I see. I think the fix is basically enable pinned TLBs. Then a much > bigger area will be mapped. Did they try that? Don't know if the kernel in question fit in 16 MiB or not... it wasn't a request for assistance, just a "hey, I ran into this, you might want to look at mapping more memory by default" note. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
