On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:39 PM Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > Handling probing code for a particular uclass between > dm vs nodm always confusing and requires additional > ifdefs to handle them properly. > > But, having separate low-level code bases for dm and > nodm can make it easy for the command level to use same > function name to probe the devices. This would indeed > avoid extra ifdef call in source code. > > So, this patch probes the spi flash in common legacy > call spi_flash_probe for both dm and nodm devices and > give a chance to handle on respective code bases based > on the build files. > > Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > Cc: Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> > Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierz...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> > ---
I'm moving with this since we still have few drivers left for nondm code for SPL. Jagan.
