On 6/8/20 2:24 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > It is in u-boot mainline from February. Then we had to fix it in April.
Do you have a link/commit hash for said fix? > In the middle of this I have seen IIC one patchset which improves hex > handling which is likely better way then this. Same for this. > I am fine with reverting this patch but I would also like to see more > comments in the code to say that we shouldn't really change this. This seems like a larger issue. There is a lot of code in U-Boot implementing the C standard library, especially the string library. Should we have a comment in each file which says something like "The functions here implement the C standard, think carefully before making semantic changes"? --Sean
