On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 12:57 PM Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: > > Hi jagan, > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> > >Sent: 02 May 2020 22:43 > >To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >Cc: U-Boot-Denx <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Atish Patra > ><atish.pa...@wdc.com>; Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabb...@google.com>; Bin > >Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>; Paul Walmsley <paul.walms...@sifive.com>; > >Troy Benjegerdes <troy.benjeger...@sifive.com>; Anup Patel > ><anup.pa...@wdc.com>; Sagar Kadam <sagar.ka...@sifive.com>; Rick Chen > ><r...@andestech.com> > >Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 19/22] sifive: dts: fu540: Enable L2 Cache in U-Boot > > > >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize the > >sender and know the content is safe > > > >On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 10:12 PM Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >wrote: > >> > >> Hi Jagan, > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> > >> >Sent: 02 May 2020 21:49 > >> >To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >> >Cc: U-Boot-Denx <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Atish Patra > >> ><atish.pa...@wdc.com>; Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabb...@google.com>; > >Bin > >> >Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>; Paul Walmsley > ><paul.walms...@sifive.com>; > >> >Troy Benjegerdes <troy.benjeger...@sifive.com>; Anup Patel > >> ><anup.pa...@wdc.com>; Sagar Kadam <sagar.ka...@sifive.com>; Rick > >Chen > >> ><r...@andestech.com> > >> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 19/22] sifive: dts: fu540: Enable L2 Cache in > >> >U-Boot > >> > > >> >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you > >> >recognize the sender and know the content is safe > >> > > >> >On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 3:39 PM Pragnesh Patel > >> ><pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >> >wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Add L2 cache node to enable cache ways from U-Boot > >> > > >> >This and 20/22 doesn't relate to SPL MMC boot?, if yes please send > >> >them separately. > >> > >> This series is for replacing FSBL and all the patches are related to that. > >> IMHO it's better to add all FSBL functionality in one series. > > > >You mean does it break existing FSBL flow? if yes add proper commit message, > >but I am able to boot SPL MMC w/o this? > > Cache ways are enabled by FSBL also and if I will send cache ways patches > separately then it will a duplicate > way of enabling cache ways if someone using FSBL.
Sorry I didn't get you. If we cannot include these changes does U-Boot SPL break existing FSBL? Jagan.
