Hi Aiden, On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 1:44 PM Park, Aiden <aiden.p...@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 1:16 PM > > To: Park, Aiden <aiden.p...@intel.com> > > Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>; U-Boot Mailing List <u- > > b...@lists.denx.de> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] x86: Add a new X86_RUN_64BIT_ONLY to Kconfig > > > > Hi Aiden, > > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 18:45, <aiden.p...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > From: Aiden Park <aiden.p...@intel.com> > > > > > > This will build U-Boot as a pure 64-bit binary with no SPL. > > > It can be used with a pre-stage boot firmware which has already done > > > 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit init. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Aiden Park <aiden.p...@intel.com> > > > --- > > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index > > > c8eae24c07..89add17e69 100644 > > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@ config X86_RUN_64BIT > > > runs through the 16-bit and 32-bit init, then switches to 64-bit > > > mode and jumps to U-Boot proper. > > > > > > +config X86_RUN_64BIT_ONLY > > > > Perhaps X86_RUN_64BIT_NO_SPL? Bin might hav a better idea. > > > I considered X64_RUN_64BIT_NO_SPL, X64_RUN_64BIT_PURE and > X64_RUN_64BIT_NATIVE. > Hi Bin, can you recommend better naming?
Cannot figure out a better name :) Let's use it. Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> Regards, Bin
