> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:55:14PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > > Hi Simon, Andy, > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:55 AM Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 11:39, Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:56:26AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 08:45, Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 5:32 PM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:58 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > > > > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The commit breaks serial console on the Intel Edison. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This reverts commit 720f9e1fdb0c92d3fd16e1bfc25bcbd35612675c. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > > > > > > > > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > drivers/serial/ns16550.c | 40 > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++---------------------------- > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please spend some time to investigate why this breaks > > > > > > > Intel > Edison? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reverting this patch would mean we break other boards too as > > > > > > > Wolfgang's patch wanted to fix the breakage in the first > > > > > > > place. Much appreciated! > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess I'm wrong person here. The DM code is a complete black box > > > > > > to > me. > > > > > > Nevertheless, I may test any provided fix / debug / etc patch by > > > > > > request. > > > > > > > > > > > > And I think it's fair to investigate by the one who made a > > > > > > regression in the first place. > > > > > > > > > > Given that we have conflicting breakages, we need to debug Edison. > > > > > > > > I would glad to test any suggested change or debug patch! > > > > > > > > > Does it enable the debug UART? > > > > > > > > If I am not mistaken, it does not. > > > > > > Looks like you are right. If you know the address you could do that > > > - see minnowmax for an example. > > > > Please suggest what's the best approach to proceed. > > Adding SoCFPGA folks to this thread as the first commit (82de42fa1468) is also > breaking platforms there and then their fix for that problem is also causing > problems, if I follow right. > > -- > Tom
Yes. This commit (82de42fa1468) breaks our A10 platform. I did submit similar patch to move some init code from ofdata_to_platdata() to probe() for our clock driver as well. Check out the thread here: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2020-April/405252.html