Dear Vignesh, In message <9a1e75ac-135a-26aa-2ded-784fbe14b...@ti.com> you wrote: > > I fully understand your concerns and will work on unifying the two > stacks with IS_ENABLED() macro so that there will still be a tiny stack > with same memory footprint.
Thanks!! > But I want to state that the differences currently in spi-nor-tiny.c vs > spi-nor-core.c are intentional. I don't think there have been any fixes > in the main code missing from tiny stack. > Features such as Octal mode and other stuff have been intentionally kept > out of spi-nor-tiny to avoid code size increase. Understood. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as well try making it round this time. - Mike Dennison
