On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:33 PM Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > On 30/01/2020 12:00, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > On 03/01/2020 23:08, Andre Przywara wrote: > >> Commit 27c3f70f3b50 ("net: phy: Increase link up delay in > >> genphy_update_link()") increased the per-iteration waiting time from > >> 1ms to 50ms, without adjusting the timeout counter. This lead to the > >> timeout increasing from the typical 4 seconds to over three minutes. > >> > >> Adjust the timeout counter evaluation by that factor of 50 to bring the > >> timeout back to the intended value. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
A "Fixes:" tag would have been nice... Anyway: Tested-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com> > > > > I tested this on RPi4 with the genet patches on top. Now the timeout is > > reasonable :) > > > > Tested-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrug...@suse.com> > > > > Friedly reminder, are you planning to take this fix for v2020.04? Yes, please! This timeout is really annoying right now! Regards, Simon > > Regards, > Matthias > > >> --- > >> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c > >> index 80a7664e49..5cf9c165b6 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c > >> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ int genphy_update_link(struct phy_device *phydev) > >> /* > >> * Timeout reached ? > >> */ > >> - if (i > PHY_ANEG_TIMEOUT) { > >> + if (i > (PHY_ANEG_TIMEOUT / 50)) { > >> printf(" TIMEOUT !\n"); > >> phydev->link = 0; > >> return -ETIMEDOUT; > >> >