On 3/1/20 9:27 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 5:06 AM Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Explicitly cast fdt_addr_t to a void pointer, since we pass it to readl. > > Explicitly cast => Change? > > As what the patch does
The compiler was giving a warning since readl expects a pointer but fdt_addr_t is typedef to some numeric type. This patch doesn't change the variable we get from the fdt subsystem to a void pointer, but it does change the base address we store to one. --Sean
