Hi Sean, On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:05 PM Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Instead of always using the "clock-frequency" property to determine cpu > frequency, try using a clock in "clocks" if it exists. This patch also > fixes a bug where there could be spurious higher frequencies if sizeof(u32) > != sizeof(ulong). >
I just realized the commit title looked a little bit confusing. I think it could be more specific like: riscv: Try to get cpu frequency from a "clocks" node if it exists ? Regards, Bin
