Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4c5ca269.8010...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > considering that both AVR32 and AT91 share most of the peripheral hardware > building blocks, and therefore share the drivers, it seems to make sense to > have an atmel custodian tree instead of avr32 and at91. Each change to a > shared > driver must (at least with MAKEALL) be checked for both architectures and > adding it to both trees would make life unnecessary complicated...
I'm fine with that. You take this, then? :-) Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "...one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs." - Robert Firth _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
