Hi Faiz,
On 2/18/20 7:35 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Faiz,
>
> On 2/17/20 9:42 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> Jaehoon,
>>
>> On 17/02/20 5:47 pm, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2/5/20 4:33 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>> Hi Peng,
>>>>
>>>> On 05/02/20 12:58 pm, Peng Fan wrote:
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] mmc: sdhci: Expose sdhci_init() as
>>>>>> non-static
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 31/01/20 3:55 am, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 30.01.2020 um 23:21 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
>>>>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/29/20 11:16 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:00 AM Jaehoon Chung
>>>>>>>>> <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/24/20 8:52 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Expose sdhci_init() as non-static.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does it need to change to non-static?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And even if it needs to, can we have a reason *why* in the commit
>>>>>>>>> message?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When i read entire your series, it seems that doesn't need to change
>>>>>>>> to non-static.
>>>>>>>> All of change that touched MMC code are only for your board.
>>>>>>>> I don't know Peng's opinion, but it's not my prefer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We need to keep the core code clean of such hacks in order to keep the
>>>>>>> size small for constrained targets!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peng can you comment on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just one more question, does kernel has same issue, how resolved?
>>>>> Could U-Boot follow similar approach?
>>>>
>>>> Kernel has interrupts enabled. So software just has to wait for the card
>>>> detect interrupt to arrive rather than poll on anything.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually I am fine with platform specific approach , considering
>>>>> your platform issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> But since Simon and Jaehoon has concerns, not sure whether
>>>>> Simon and Jaehoon have good ideas.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok. Lets see if they have some better ideas.
>>>
>>> Well, Your code needs to call am654_sdhci_init() before sdhci_init(), right?
>>>
>>> ops->init() -> am654_sdhci_init -> sdhci_init().
>>> If am654_sdhci_init is called for preset, how about adding pre_init() or
>>> other ops callback.
>>> (pre_init is just example.)
>>>
>>> ops->pre_init = am654_sdhci_init; or ops->preset = am654_sdhci_preset;
>>>
>>> In mmc.
>>>
>>> ops->preset or ops->pre_init -> ops->init
>>>
>>> How about adding plotform specific init callback? Then someone can also use
>>> it for platform specific things in future.
>>>
>>
>> So we basically want an init() callback even in sdhci.c.
>>
>> I have to create one more wrapper sdhci_pltaform_init() API in the sdhci
>> driver that just calls a platform init function inside it. So its
>
> Yes, I checked wrong sequence. Sorry.
>
> When i have checked, some functions are needs.
>
>>
>> include/sdhci.h:
>>
>> struct sdhci_ops {
>> ..
>> + int (*platform_init)()
>>
>> and then drivers/mmc/sdhci.c:
>>
>>
>> +sdhci_platform_init()
>> +{
>> +...
>> + host->ops->platform_init();
>> +}
>>
>> const struct dm_mmc_ops sdhci_ops = {
>> ...
>> + .init = sdhci_platform_init,
>> };
>>
>> Right?
>
> Right. but not init. Just platform_init?
>
> Well, if you want, i will make patch about callback function.
How about below codes? Then you can just add am654_sdhci_deferred_probe { ...
return sdhci_probe() .. }
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
index 0b90a97650..c75892a72c 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
@@ -138,6 +138,21 @@ int mmc_host_power_cycle(struct mmc *mmc)
return dm_mmc_host_power_cycle(mmc->dev);
}
+int dm_mmc_deferred_probe(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct dm_mmc_ops *ops = mmc_get_ops(dev);
+
+ if (ops->deferred_probe)
+ return ops->deferred_probe(dev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int mmc_deferred_probe(struct mmc *mmc)
+{
+ return dm_mmc_deferred_probe(mmc->dev);
+}
+
int mmc_of_parse(struct udevice *dev, struct mmc_config *cfg)
{
int val;
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
index d43983d4a6..9eae538af4 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
@@ -2790,6 +2790,7 @@ int mmc_get_op_cond(struct mmc *mmc)
#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_MMC)
/* The device has already been probed ready for use */
+ mmc_deferred_probe(mmc);
#else
/* made sure it's not NULL earlier */
err = mmc->cfg->ops->init(mmc);
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
index 01fa5a9d4d..9ff37b888b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
@@ -661,6 +661,20 @@ int sdhci_probe(struct udevice *dev)
return sdhci_init(mmc);
}
+static int sdhci_deferred_probe(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct mmc *mmc = mmc_get_mmc_dev(dev);
+ struct sdhci_host *host = mmc->priv;
+
+ if (host->ops && host->ops->deferred_probe) {
+ err = host->ops->deferred_probe(host);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int sdhci_get_cd(struct udevice *dev)
{
struct mmc *mmc = mmc_get_mmc_dev(dev);
@@ -695,6 +709,7 @@ const struct dm_mmc_ops sdhci_ops = {
.send_cmd = sdhci_send_command,
.set_ios = sdhci_set_ios,
.get_cd = sdhci_get_cd,
+ .deferred_probe = sdhci_deferred_probe,
#ifdef MMC_SUPPORTS_TUNING
.execute_tuning = sdhci_execute_tuning,
#endif
diff --git a/include/mmc.h b/include/mmc.h
index b5cb514f57..b362b7f4c7 100644
--- a/include/mmc.h
+++ b/include/mmc.h
@@ -477,6 +477,8 @@ struct dm_mmc_ops {
* @return 0 if not present, 1 if present, -ve on error
*/
int (*host_power_cycle)(struct udevice *dev);
+
+ int (*deferred_probe)(struct udevice *dev);
};
#define mmc_get_ops(dev) ((struct dm_mmc_ops *)(dev)->driver->ops)
@@ -489,6 +491,7 @@ int dm_mmc_get_wp(struct udevice *dev);
int dm_mmc_execute_tuning(struct udevice *dev, uint opcode);
int dm_mmc_wait_dat0(struct udevice *dev, int state, int timeout_us);
int dm_mmc_host_power_cycle(struct udevice *dev);
+int dm_mmc_deferred_probe(struct udevice *dev);
/* Transition functions for compatibility */
int mmc_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc);
@@ -498,6 +501,7 @@ int mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc *mmc, uint opcode);
int mmc_wait_dat0(struct mmc *mmc, int state, int timeout_us);
int mmc_set_enhanced_strobe(struct mmc *mmc);
int mmc_host_power_cycle(struct mmc *mmc);
+int mmc_deferred_probe(struct mmc *mmc);
#else
struct mmc_ops {
diff --git a/include/sdhci.h b/include/sdhci.h
index 01addb7a60..1276f43935 100644
--- a/include/sdhci.h
+++ b/include/sdhci.h
@@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct sdhci_ops {
void (*set_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 div);
int (*platform_execute_tuning)(struct mmc *host, u8 opcode);
void (*set_delay)(struct sdhci_host *host);
+ int (*deferred_probe)(struct sdhci_host *host);
};
#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MMC_SDHCI_ADMA)
>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Faiz
>>
>>
>
>
>
