On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:00 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:52 PM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:39 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:41 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahi...@kernel.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:31 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > > <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... > > > > OK, as my intuition told me the problematic one is > > > > > > commit 0d67fac29f3187e67f4fd3ef15f73e91be2fad12 > > > Author: Masahiro Yamada <masahi...@kernel.org> > > > Date: Wed Jan 8 20:08:44 2020 +0900 > > > > > > x86: use invd instead of wbinvd in real mode start code > > > > > > > > > Please, revert or fix ASAP before v2020.04 release! > > > ^^^ > > > > > > > > > P.S. I dunno how it has been tested, so, if you have Intel Edison in > > > > > > possession, please, don't forget to test on it. It's not first time > > > > > > the Intel Edison behaviour is broken due to poor testing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tested my patches on qemu. > > > > > > > > Exactly my point of definition "poor". > > > > It's not first time (and not last) when QEmu sucks. > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the breakage on your board, but I do not > > > > > have Edison board. > > > > > It is not possible to test every board. > > > > > > > > No problem, it's rather to x86 maintainers to have at least one-two > > > > real hardware testing before applying this. > > > > QEMU is completely not enough! > > > Is that because on Intel Edison U-Boot is not the first stage bootloader? > > I don't know for sure, but I may speculate that this is a prerequisite.
anyway, for now please send a revert patch. Regards, Bin
