Hi Simon, > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 00:56, Wolfgang Wallner > <wolfgang.wall...@br-automation.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Simon, > > > > > -----"Simon Glass" <s...@chromium.org> schrieb: ----- > > > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 02:55, Wolfgang Wallner > > > <wolfgang.wall...@br-automation.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Simon, Bin, all, > > > > > > > > I have an Apollo Lake based device, where U-Boot is booted as a Coreboot > > > > payload. I would like to utilize the Apollo Lake GPIO driver > > > > (drivers/gpio/intel_gpio.c), but I struggle with the dependencies. > > > > > > > > For my use case, I face 2 obstacles: > > > > > > > > 1) Some required drivers are not built > > > > > > > > The Apollo Lake GPIO driver requires the P2SB and ITSS drivers, but > > > > those > > > > are located in arch/x86/cpu/apollolake. Drivers in this directory > > > > are not > > > > included in my build as it builds for Coreboot, not for Apollo Lake. > > > > > > > > 2) Some header files are not found > > > > > > > > The header files gpio.h and itss.h are located in > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/arch-apollolake, but as I build for Coreboot > > > > the > > > > symlink arch/x86/include/asm/arch points to arch-coreboot instead of > > > > arch-apollolake, so those header files are not found. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have recommendations on how to solve those issues? > > > > Would it be possible to move the drivers for P2SB and ITSS out of > > > > arch/x86/cpu/apollolake to the generic drivers/ directory? > > > > > > I don't have any great ideas. At present we rely on the device tree to > > > bind these drivers but I suppose we could add the PCI IDs and then the > > > coreboot target could bind them. > > > > I have added the relevant entries in my device tree, the point is that the > > required drivers are not even built, because they are located in the > > Apollo Lake directory. This is why I asked wheter we could move them to the > > generic drivers directory. (This could also make sense IMHO as they are not > > specific for Apollo Lake, but could be used for mulitple generations of > > chips) > > Yes that sounds OK to me.
Ok, thanks for the feedback. As a first step, I will send a patch series to move the ITSS driver to a more common location within arch/x86. regards, Wolfgang