On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 09:31:08AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 12/12/19 1:47 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > These are filesystem functions and belong in the filesystem header file. > > Move them. > > I am not very fond of having any file system dependencies outside of > disk/ and part/. > > Do we need the functions do_ext2load() and do_fat_fsload() at all? > > What is the benefit of the file system parameter in the sysboot command?
A patch to make CMD_SYSBOOT depend on CMD_FS_GENERIC and see if everyone is already doing that would be good. Implementation-wise it's going to be fat/ext2/tftp. > Why have a restriction to ext2 in board/inversepath/usbarmory/usbarmory.c? Intended usage only maybe? I'll let Andrej chime in here. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
