On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 07:10:29AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 07:51, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 12:53:39PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > These functions do not use driver model but are fairly widely used in > > > U-Boot. Move them to a new irq_legacy.h header file. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > I'm still weighing what I want to say about cpu_legacy.h but I feel like > > for irq_legancy.h we're getting ahead of ourselves. What is the DM > > model for this? Why do we need it? I didn't dig in to every function > > but it looks like we have a mix of U-Boot ABI functions and exception > > handlers. That stuff must be very lean. Thanks! > > Yes fair enough. > > We have had an IRQ uclass for a while but it is not widely used (just > on x86 and only for probing). I don't want to call this irq.h since it > is so common, so I'll rename to irq_funcs.h I think.
Works for me, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
