On 10/24/19 11:25 AM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> On 24-Oct-19 7:16 PM, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>> Putting Vignesh to "To:".
>>
>> Hi Vignesh,
>>
>> Please address Tero's comments below (I've marked with ^^^). Thanks.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:54 PM Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24/10/2019 13:32, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>>> Hi Tero,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:32 AM Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23/10/2019 17:20, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>>>>> + fixed U-Boot mailing list address
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 3:13 PM Sam Protsenko
>>>>>> <semen.protse...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Tero,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch was merged in U-Boot/master recently:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> e8e683d33b0c ("board: ti: am57xx-idk: Configure the CDCE913 clock
>>>>>>> synthesizer")
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately it leads to a regression in fastboot code on BeagleBoard
>>>>>>> X15. Basically fastboot stops to work, with a message like this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> => fastboot 1
>>>>>>> No USB device found
>>>>>>> USB init failed: -19
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't investigated that as I'm busy with Android boot flow patch
>>>>>>> series at the moment (trying to merge it before merge window closes).
>>>>>>> Can you please investigate what is the cause and how to fix it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> This seems to be caused by usb dwc3 init failing to get clks, if
>>>>> CONFIG_CLK is enabled. We appear to have the attached patch which fixes
>>>>> it in TI internal u-boot tree; it fixes the issue with latest u-boot also.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should this be picked for upstream also? (CC: Vignesh)
>>
>
> Yes, this patch is applicable upstream as well. I did not get time to
> post this series to upstream list.
>
>> ^^^
>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can confirm that that patch helps. If it's a proper fix, can you
>>>> please send it here? Also, I guess it would be nice to have next tags
>>>> specified: Fixes:, Reported-by:.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Vignesh, any comments as you are the author of that patch? The
>>> background on it is somewhat unclear to me.
>>>
>>
>
> In case of AM57xx, USB clocks are enabled by board files. Therefore clk
> and reset APIs may return -ENOENT as nodes may be absent in the DT.
Would it be better to move these clocks over to DT?
> Since clks and resets are optional, -ENOENT needs to be ignored as well.
>
So clocks populated by board config and those that are missing/optional
will have the same effect? Sounds wrong to me.
Andrew
>
>> ^^^
>>
>>> -Tero
>>> --
>>> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
>>> Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
