Add Jagan.
Hi Simon,
On 2019/10/22 上午7:46, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 03:07, Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com> wrote:
On 2019/10/7 上午2:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
A trusted execution environment should also get loaded as loadable from
a fit image, so add the possibility to present a tee.elf to make_fit_atf.py
that then gets included as additional loadable into the generated its.
For ease of integration the additional loadable is created as atf_(x+1)
after all others to re-use core generation loops.
Tested against the combinations of 1-part-atf and multi-part-atf each
time with and without a tee binary present.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang<kever.y...@rock-chips.com>
Thanks,
- Kever
---
changes in v2: none
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/make_fit_atf.py | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I see there is an effort to move this to binman. To me that is a much
more productive approach!
Do you mean the patch set from Jagan for rockchip platform to using binman?
That patch is actually using the output of the u-boot.itb which is based
on this script.
Is there a feature or example missing in binman that you need to get
this over the hump?
I think Heiko and you has a discussion about this in previous version
thread.
The U-Boot project build output is: tpl.bin, spl.bin, u-boot.bin
For rockchip platform, package needs:
- pack tpl.bin+spl.bin with mkimage -rksd/rkspi into idbloader.img
- get ATF binaries from bl31.bin/optee.bin with a script
- generate u-boot.its to describe the u-boot.itb
- pack u-boot.bin and ATF/OPTEE binaries into u-boot.itb with mkimage -f
u-boot.its
Does the binman mainly target for pack the idbloader.img+u-boot.itb?
Thanks,
- Kever
Would like to avoid lots of random scripts in U-Boot for building images.
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
