Hi Matthias, On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:57, Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On 05/09/2019 10:48, matthias....@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Matthias Brugger <mbrug...@suse.com> > > > > The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the > > upstream project. Especially the default number of size-cells > > was wrong. This series fixes this by backporting the corresponding > > patches from the upstream project. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - fix spelling of U-Boot (patch 1 + 2 /4) > > - add Reviewed-by tag (patch 1/4) > > - fix the case of size-cells == 0 (patch 3/4) > > - fix default address cells for livetree (patch 4/4) > > > > v1 can be found here: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137331/ > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137330/ > > > > > > Matthias Brugger (4): > > libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells() > > libfdt: return correct value if #size-cells property is not present > > libfdt: Allow #size-cells of 0 > > dm: Fix default address cells return value > > > > include/dm/of.h | 2 +- > > scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_addresses.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++-------------- > > scripts/dtc/libfdt/libfdt.h | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > Any comments on this? I tried to find your custodian tree, but wasn't able to > do > so and check if you took it already.
This was applied. Did you not get the emails on each patch? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
