On 11/10/2019 10:00 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 10/9/19 10:36 AM, Fabien Dessenne wrote:
>> The .is_running() ops expects a return value of 0 if the processor is
>> running, 1 if not running : align to this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.desse...@st.com>
> This patch should be earlier than patch4, right?
You're probably right. I will double check this in v2.
>
> Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-a...@ti.com>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
>> index eef3416..fce9653 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
>> @@ -237,14 +237,14 @@ static int stm32_copro_stop(struct udevice *dev)
>> /**
>> * stm32_copro_is_running() - Is the STM32 remote processor running
>> * @dev: corresponding STM32 remote processor device
>> - * @return 1 if the remote processor is running, 0 otherwise
>> + * @return 0 if the remote processor is running, 1 otherwise
>> */
>> static int stm32_copro_is_running(struct udevice *dev)
>> {
>> struct stm32_copro_privdata *priv;
>>
>> priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
>> - return priv->is_running;
>> + return !priv->is_running;
>> }
>>
>> static const struct dm_rproc_ops stm32_copro_ops = {
>>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
