Hi Bin, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> writes:
>> And which "Linux DTB" should that be? Since RISC-V seems to be going > > The one in arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive. Yes, but in which Linux? This whole thing started because U-Boot will no longer accept the DTB used with Linux 4.14. If each Linux version is going to have its own incompatible DTB then U-Boot either needs to decide which one to work with, or work with the vendor DTB (which would be perferable in my opinion). > As for the syntax of the nodes keep changing, I would say that's > inevitable because of the upstreaming process. Everything in vendor's > DT that does not get merged in Linux will remain potentially changed > by later upstreaming reviews. An upstreaming review that suggests changing a driver so that it no longer works with the vendor's DTB is IMHO contraproductive and against the very idea of DTB, but I suppose there's little that can be done to affect the review process over at Linux land... It would be nice if this weirdness did not spill over on U-Boot/OpenSBI though. // Marcus _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
