On 05.09.19 10:06, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
When backspacing in column 0 do no set the column index to ULONG_MAX.
Ensure that the row number is not set to ULONG_MAX even if the row count is
advertised as 0.
Ignore control characters other the 0x08, 0x0a, 0x0d when updating the
column.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
---
  lib/efi_loader/efi_console.c | 12 ++++++++----
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_console.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_console.c
index d4765afb98..d5222c46b4 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_console.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_console.c
@@ -156,13 +156,14 @@ static efi_status_t EFIAPI efi_cout_output_string(
         * Update the cursor position.
         *
         * The UEFI spec provides advance rules for U+0000, U+0008, U+000A,
-        * and U000D. All other characters, including control characters
-        * U+0007 (BEL) and U+0009 (TAB), have to increase the column by one.
+        * and U000D. All other control characters are ignored. Any non-control
+        * character increase the column by one.
         */
        for (p = string; *p; ++p) {
                switch (*p) {
                case '\b':      /* U+0008, backspace */
-                       con->cursor_column = max(0, con->cursor_column - 1);
+                       if (con->cursor_column)
+                               con->cursor_column--;
                        break;
                case '\n':      /* U+000A, newline */
                        con->cursor_column = 0;
@@ -178,13 +179,16 @@ static efi_status_t EFIAPI efi_cout_output_string(
                         */
                        break;
                default:
-                       con->cursor_column++;
+                       if (*p > 0x1f)


What is the 0x1f here? I know, control character, but it's not obvious. Probably wants either a comment or a define.


+                               con->cursor_column++;
                        break;
                }
                if (con->cursor_column >= mode->columns) {
                        con->cursor_column = 0;
                        con->cursor_row++;
                }
+               if (con->cursor_row >= mode->rows && con->cursor_row)
+                       con->cursor_row--;


I don't understand this statement. When is the cursor_row >= mode->rows? Is this just to offset an incorrect cursor_row from the line above? Can't we just fold it in there?


Alex


_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to