Dne St 23. Ĩervna 2010 22:51:28 Wolfgang Denk napsal(a): > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <1277320683-2057-1-git-send-email-marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> > > --- > > > > common/cmd_ide.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- > > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > I don't see the big advantage of this patch yet.
It won't compile at least on ARM. Same case as with the dm9000 ethernet adapter. > > > #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_ATA_PORT_ADDR > > > > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ __ide_outb(int dev, int port, unsigned char val) > > > > { > > > > debug ("ide_outb (dev= %d, port= 0x%x, val= 0x%02x) : @ 0x%08lx\n", > > > > dev, port, val, (ATA_CURR_BASE(dev)+CONFIG_SYS_ATA_PORT_ADDR(port))); > > > > - outb(val, (ATA_CURR_BASE(dev)+CONFIG_SYS_ATA_PORT_ADDR(port))); > > + writeb(val, (ATA_CURR_BASE(dev)+CONFIG_SYS_ATA_PORT_ADDR(port))); > > So we replace outb() => writeb(), but the function where this is used > is still __ide_outb() ? > > The __ide_outb() => outb() mapping looks more logical to me. See above. > > > -output_data(int dev, ulong *sect_buf, int words) > > +output_data(int dev, uint16_t *sect_buf, int words) > > > > { > > > > - outsw(ATA_CURR_BASE(dev)+ATA_DATA_REG, sect_buf, words<<1); > > + int i; > > + for (i = 0; i < (words << 1); i++) > > + writew(sect_buf[i], ATA_CURR_BASE(dev)+ATA_DATA_REG); > > And here the code size is growing, too. Possibly, I was unsure if there is some implementation of writesw/readsw elsewhere then on PPC. > > What are the exact advantages of your version? That it actually compiles and works on other architectures than ppc. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk Cheers _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot