On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> static int do_errata(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> + __maybe_unused u32 svr = get_svr();
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_SATA_V2) && defined(CONFIG_FSL_SATA_ERRATUM_A001)
> + if (IS_SVR_REV(svr, 1, 0) &&
> + ((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P1022) ||
> + (SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P1022_E) ||
> + (SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P1013) ||
> + (SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P1013_E))) {
> + puts("Work-around for Erratum SATA A001 enabled\n");
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> return 0;
> }
How are you planning on handling chip-specific errata? Do you forsee
do_errata() containing code for every erratum of every chip?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
