Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Ah, that's a serious limitation. > > No, it is not. Testing is done per bank.
Ok, I get it now. I'm supposed to call get_ram_size() on each DIMM I locate. That's going to be complicated because we don't have any TLBs set up when we do that. And what if we have a 4GB DIMM? Because virtual addresses are still 32-bits, we would need to change get_ram_size() to modify a temporary TLB while it's reading/writing memory. So we'd need to have an e300 version of get_ram_size(), an e500 version, an e600 version, and so on. So I have a question: are you still going to require me to use get_ram_size() in my P1022DS board patch? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
