On 5/26/19 12:45 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 00:24 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 5/25/19 11:47 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2019-05-25 at 22:15 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 5/25/19 6:49 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>>>> i.MX6 platforms boot U-Boot second-stage from unformatted space,
>>>>> and should not need Ext filesystem support on SPL.
>>>>>
>>>>> The commit was generated with:
>>>>>
>>>>> git grep -l MX6 -- configs/ | xargs grep -l SPL_FS_EXT4 | xargs sed -i -e 
>>>>> '/CONFIG_SPL_FS_EXT4=y/d'
>>>>>
>>>>> This change has a dramatic impact on SPL size:
>>>>>
>>>>> ./scripts/bloat-o-meter old new
>>>>> add/remove: 0/59 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-8674 (-8674)
>>>>> [..]
>>>>> Total: Before=38320, After=29646, chg -22.64%
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br>
>>>>> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>
>>>>> Cc: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com>
>>>>> Cc: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
>>>>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de>
>>>>> Cc: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
>>>>> Cc: "Eric Bénard" <e...@eukrea.com>
>>>>> Cc: Breno Lima <breno.l...@nxp.com>
>>>>> Cc: Francesco Montefoschi <francesco.montefos...@udoo.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequ...@collabora.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Tested on Wandboard only. Maintainers, please ACK or NAK!
>>>>>
>>>>>  configs/cgtqmx6eval_defconfig       | 1 -
>>>>>  configs/mx6cuboxi_defconfig         | 1 -
>>>>>  configs/mx6sabreauto_defconfig      | 1 -
>>>>>  configs/mx6sabresd_defconfig        | 1 -
>>>>>  configs/mx6slevk_spl_defconfig      | 1 -
>>>>>  configs/mx6sxsabresd_spl_defconfig  | 1 -
>>>>>  configs/mx6ul_14x14_evk_defconfig   | 1 -
>>>>>  configs/mx6ul_9x9_evk_defconfig     | 1 -
>>>>>  configs/novena_defconfig            | 1 -
>>>>
>>>> NAK, I boot my Novena from ext4 and this just broke it.
>>>>
>>>> And also, NAK, this removes functionality from SPL which worked fine 
>>>> before.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll drop from Novena, but I think the patch still makes some sense,
>>> why do you want Ext4 on SPL?
>>
>> What other filesystem is available in SPL and doesn't have patent problems ?
>>
> 
> Sorry for not being clear. I am asking why turn on a feature that is so heavy,
> on a system that won't need it (such as Sabre* boards, Wandboard and similar)?

Two reasons:
1) It was enabled, disabling it means removing functionality for no good
   reason (oops, bloat, is not a good reason), and that is not desired.
2) Booting from block device implies booting from a filesystem,
   otherwise you might overwrite various things on the block device when
   updating the file (u-boot image).
-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to