Hi Kever, On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 19:03, Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > On 03/31/2019 05:18 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Kever, > > > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:01, Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com> wrote: > >> Rockchip use 'arch-rockchip' instead of arch-$(SOC) as common > >> header file path, so that we can get the correct path directly. > > Can you give a few more details on the reason for this change? I > > cannot see the benefit? > > 1. 'rockchip' is not SOC name but vendor name, we'd better use correct name; > 2. the build system will include $(SOC)-u-boot.dtsi automatically > without modify > $(SOC).dtsi or $(board).dtsi, if the $(SOC) default to 'rockchip', > we can't use > this feature.
OK I see. So far Rockchip has been designed so that a single U-Boot (proper) can support multiple SoCs, although in practice we don't use that ability. So I don't think it is a big problem to drop it. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
